I was listening to NPR this morning on my way to work and heard the news about unrest in Bahrain (plus all the other countries that are experiencing civil unrest) and then got to thinking about what’s going on in Japan vs. Bahrain.

I think that there are two kinds of disasters (and yes, political upheaval is a disaster, at the time it’s happening): Unitive and divisive.

Political situations are always polarizing. I feel pretty confident about stating this as an absolute. You’ve got the side that agrees, and the side that doesn’t, and caught in the middle are the folks who either sort of agree, sort of disagree, or really would rather be left out of the whole thing altogether. Like the subsistence farmer, who doesn’t actually think a whole lot about it as long as he can make a living and feed his family and nobody bothers him. Anyway, these situations are by their very nature divisive ones, pushing people apart even in countries thousands of miles away.

Natural disasters can be much more  unitive in nature. People can sympathize with the people suffering from the disaster. People far away pull together to help out those in need, across ideological boundaries and prejudices, because you’d want somebody to help you in the same situation.

And I know that nothing is as simple as that. It’s never so black and white. But I think also that there’s a human duty to help bring people together in divisive situations, too, because they require the most effort. I’m not saying that we do exactly the same thing as we’d do to help in a natural disaster. The core need is different in each situation. But we should address that need. If the need is manpower and food and water, then we need to pitch in to help with that. If the need is understanding and brotherhood, then we all need to pitch in and do our best to treat each other with respect.

(I think this may be part of the answer that other question I’m wrestling with.)

About HappyGoth

By day, I'm a graphic designer. By night, I'm a knitter. I'm doing my part to keep Hotlanta stylish. I imagine that if you don't already understand the title of the blog, you're probably confused and perhaps slightly annoyed, but never fear - I do have a reason (and it's a good one). Having gone to hear Stephanie Pearl McPhee, and then having been inspired to blog about knitting, I found myself wondering what to call the blog. I recalled a conversation I had with Mouse and the Chicken Goddess about why it is a Bad Idea to anger knitters - this conversation was following SPM, aka the Yarn Harlot telling the assembled throng about Those Who Do Not Understand Knitting and Therefore Belittle It Much to the Chagrin of Others, or TWDNUKTBMCO, which is not the acronym she used but is the one I'm using because I forgot hers - that is, we are numerous and we all have very pointy sticks, easily transforming into an angry mob. Therefore, knitters = angry mob.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Disasters

  1. Aamba says:

    That is a very interesting take on it

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s