Tamasic, rajasic, sattvic

I’m continuing to read the Bhagavad Gita and am realizing that I’m understanding a little more of it each time I pick it up (or maybe I just think I am, but I feel like I am for the time being, so I’m going with that feeling).

I particularly like the part when Krishna talks to Arjuna about the enlightened person and the three Guṇas of prakṛti, tamas rajas and sattvas.

Reading those verses was another aha moment.

These are they:


“What are the characteristics of those who have gone beyond the gunas, O Lord? How do they act? How have they passed beyond the gunas’ hold?”


“They are unmoved by the harmony of sattva, the activity of rajas, or the delusion of tamas. They feel no aversion when these forces are active, nor do they crave for them when these forces subside.

They remain impartial, undisturbed by the actions of the gunas. Knowing that it is the gunas which act, they abide within themselves and do not vacillate.

Established within themselves, they are equal in pleasure and pain, praise and blame, kindness and unkindness. Clay, a rock and gold are the same to them. Alike in honor and dishonor, alike to friend and foe, they have given up every selfish pursuit. Such are those who have gone beyond the gunas.

By serving me with steadfast love, a man or woman goes beyond the gunas. Such a one is fit for union with Brahman. For I am the support of Brahman, the eternal, the unchanging, the deathless, the everlasting dharma, the source of all joy.”

(Bhagavad Gita, Chapter 14, verses 21-27; from the Eknath Easwaran translation)

How many times have I been out of balance, with respect to the three gunas? Probably lots. Probably right this moment. Those times when I’m tending more towards sattva are not to concerning to me, but I know that I tilt daily to the rajas, and occasionally to the tamas. I seems to me, though, that here Krishna is saying that the difference between plain old me and someone beyond the gunas isn’t that they see those three move and fluxuate in their lives, but that their actions aren’t determined by them. Each one is what it is, part of this material existence, but doesn’t have to dictate our actions.

About HappyGoth

By day, I'm a graphic designer. By night, I'm a knitter. I'm doing my part to keep Hotlanta stylish. I imagine that if you don't already understand the title of the blog, you're probably confused and perhaps slightly annoyed, but never fear - I do have a reason (and it's a good one). Having gone to hear Stephanie Pearl McPhee, and then having been inspired to blog about knitting, I found myself wondering what to call the blog. I recalled a conversation I had with Mouse and the Chicken Goddess about why it is a Bad Idea to anger knitters - this conversation was following SPM, aka the Yarn Harlot telling the assembled throng about Those Who Do Not Understand Knitting and Therefore Belittle It Much to the Chagrin of Others, or TWDNUKTBMCO, which is not the acronym she used but is the one I'm using because I forgot hers - that is, we are numerous and we all have very pointy sticks, easily transforming into an angry mob. Therefore, knitters = angry mob.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Tamasic, rajasic, sattvic

  1. surya says:

    good post on gita, tamasic is bad
    a guru is visiting your town, just in case if you are interested
    i dont know much about him, never met him

  2. 3tre says:

    followers of this guru are mostly rich indians & europeans & americans.
    he’s quite westernised english speaking mostly(even in india)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s